Dollar Architecture 2.0
Stablecoins as Treasury Demand Mechanism—And Why That's Secondary
In Day 5, we established how stablecoins extend U.S. monetary sovereignty independently of trade negotiations—citizens bypass banking infrastructure and weak currencies by opting into dollar stablecoins via smartphone. Here, we examine the fiscal and technical mechanics that weren't covered before, understanding why Treasury demand, while significant, represents the secondary benefit of this infrastructure.
The Fiscal Reality: Treasury Demand as Structural Bid
The question isn't "Will the U.S. regulate stablecoins?" The question is: What is GDP for? Michael Every at Rabobank frames it precisely: Grand strategy isn't about what GDP will be—it's about what you want GDP to look like. Stablecoins aren't a fintech innovation. They're infrastructure to transform the dollar system from financialization back to industrial production.
The GENIUS Act passed July 2025, establishing the first federal framework requiring stablecoins to be fully backed by Treasury securities and dollar reserves. While everyone debated crypto's future, Washington built the rails.
How the Treasury Mechanism Works
Every new stablecoin issued requires purchasing a dollar of Treasury securities to back it. That's not theory—it's the regulatory requirement. The scale is already significant.
Current Holdings (as of November 2025):
Tether holds $127-135 billion in U.S. Treasury bills, making it the 17th largest holder of U.S. Treasuries globally—surpassing South Korea's $124.2 billion. Circle (USDC) holds $45-55 billion. Collectively, the stablecoin industry is now the 18th largest external holder of U.S. Treasuries.
The market has grown from $28 billion in 2020 to $280+ billion in 2025—a tenfold increase in five years.
Projections to 2030:
Citi base case: $1.9 trillion market cap by 2030
Citi bull case: $4 trillion by 2030
This translates to $1-4 trillion in structural Treasury demand—permanent, not cyclical. Citi analysts project stablecoin issuers could hold more Treasuries by 2030 than any current foreign jurisdiction.
The GENIUS Act: Technical Architecture
The legislation establishes strict reserve requirements that transform stablecoins from unregulated offshore instruments into dollar-distribution infrastructure:
100% reserve backing with liquid assets—only U.S. dollars or short-term Treasuries
Monthly public disclosure of reserve composition
Permitted reserves: coins/currency, insured bank deposits, short-dated Treasury bills, repos/reverse repos backed by T-bills, government money market funds, central bank reserves
Prohibited: Everything else
Every transaction in USDC or compliant Tether extends American financial power into digital wallets globally—without requiring a CBDC that would threaten the banking system.
The Critical Distinction: Fiscal vs. Geopolitical Benefits
This is where the analysis requires precision. Brent Johnson (Santiago Capital) makes a critical point: Treasury demand is real and significant, but it's secondary. The primary strategic advantage is monetary sovereignty extension.
The Treasury Demand Benefit (Fiscal):
$1-4 trillion in structural Treasury purchases by 2030 provides direct fiscal support at a critical moment. Foreign central banks are net sellers of U.S. Treasuries (particularly after recent geopolitical tensions). Stablecoin issuers stepping in as buyers maintains Treasury demand when traditional foreign demand falters. This is real—and important for deficit financing. But it's also measurable and temporary relative to the global bond market ($130+ trillion).
The Monetary Sovereignty Benefit (Geopolitical):
Dollar-denominated stablecoins allow citizens worldwide to bypass capital controls, weak currencies, and banking infrastructure via smartphone. This is permanent. Once citizens have access to dollar stablecoins, governments lose their monopoly on currency. Chinese nationals holding USDC have opted out of yuan control. Venezuelan citizens have opted out of the Bolívar. Turkish citizens have opted out of the Lira. This mechanism operates independently of trade negotiations, tariffs, or geopolitical détente. Even if USMCA renews, even if Trump-Xi détente extends through 2026, stablecoin adoption continues expanding. The monetary sovereignty dimension explains why this infrastructure is built into the strategic architecture—it's durable across all contingencies.
Johnson's Assessment: "Treasury demand is real but secondary. The primary advantage is that you've dramatically increased the ability for citizens in foreign jurisdictions to opt out of their local currency. When you opt out of that local currency, you simultaneously opt in to U.S. currency dominance."
Market Structure: The Data That Matters
99% of fiat stablecoins are USD-pegged
This isn't regulatory mandate—it's revealed preference. Alternative stablecoins (euro-denominated, etc.) exist legally. They don't gain adoption. Markets choose dollars.
80% of stablecoin transactions occur outside the U.S.
This is the point. The infrastructure extends American monetary influence precisely where it's most needed—into jurisdictions with capital controls, weak currencies, and unreliable banking systems. The GENIUS Act essentially formalizes what the market is already doing: routing global digital commerce through dollar infrastructure.
Why CBDCs Aren't the Countermove
China has the digital yuan. Europe is developing a digital euro. But CBDCs face a structural problem that stablecoins sidestep: They're government-controlled. That's their weakness, not strength.
China's Digital Yuan: Programmable and traceable. The government can restrict transactions, enforce capital controls at the digital level, and prevent capital flight. This is exactly why adoption outside China remains minimal. Foreign investors and businesses avoid it—it gives the Chinese government too much control.
Europe's Digital Euro: ECB President Lagarde spoke in June 2025 of a 'Global Euro Moment.' By August, Politico reported the moment was over—the 'bubble bursting' due to fears of USD stablecoin penetration. The ECB warned: 'Should US dollar stablecoins become widely used in the euro area...the ECB's control over monetary conditions could be weakened.' Europe has no countermove. It lacks the collateral scale to match U.S. Treasuries. A fragmented private-sector euro stablecoin creates financial stability risks the ECB won't accept. That leaves the digital euro—centralized, government-controlled, and therefore less attractive than dollar stablecoins for cross-border use.
President Trump's January 2025 executive order explicitly prohibits U.S. agencies from supporting CBDCs 'within the jurisdiction of the US or abroad.' This isn't accident—it's strategy. The U.S. is winning the stablecoin war precisely because it's private-sector led with public oversight, not government-controlled. Citizens trust private issuers more than foreign governments. That's the structural advantage.
De-dollarization as Myth: The Data
The narrative of de-dollarization has dominated headlines for five years: BRICS alternatives, yuan internationalization, euro expansion, blockchain-based alternatives. All of it contradicted by actual market behavior. Stablecoin data shows the opposite.
99% USD-dominated stablecoin market = revealed preference for dollars over alternatives
80% non-U.S. usage = global demand for dollar infrastructure, not domestic
Tether (offshore, unregulated USDT) previously held $60+ billion in Treasuries = even unregulated offshore stablecoin chooses dollar backing
The GENIUS Act didn't create this. It formalized what the market had already chosen. De-dollarization isn't happening. Dollar dollarization is accelerating into digital infrastructure. The mechanism is just cleaner now—regulated, Treasury-backed, with perfect capital structures.
What Washington Built (While Nobody Was Watching)
While crypto advocates debated decentralization and libertarians worried about overreach, Treasury designed a system that achieves multiple strategic objectives simultaneously:
Creates permanent Treasury demand. Each dollar of stablecoin = one dollar of Treasury purchase. At $2-4 trillion scale, that's structural bid underneath the Treasury market when foreign demand is declining.
Extends dollar hegemony into digital rails. Every stablecoin transaction is a vote for dollar dominance. The infrastructure layer for the next generation of finance runs on dollars, under U.S. oversight.
Maintains private-sector innovation. Banks can issue stablecoins, compete with traditional deposits, build new products—within a framework that strengthens the dollar system.
Avoids political toxicity. No Fed-issued digital currency, no disruption to the banking system, no 'government controlling your money' narrative. Private issuers, public oversight, dollar backing. The mechanism is elegant in its alignment of incentives.
Forces geopolitical alignment. Cantor Fitzgerald—a U.S. Treasury primary dealer previously run by Howard Lutnick (now Secretary of Commerce)—manages Tether's collateral. This is dollar infrastructure, built by the U.S. government, extending American monetary reach into every corner of global digital commerce.
The Geopolitical Implication
If the U.S. didn't move, someone else would set the standard for digital money. China or Europe could have built the rails. They didn't. The U.S. did. That difference will compound for decades. Every population opting into dollar stablecoins is opting into U.S. monetary influence. Every alternative stablecoin that fails to gain adoption reinforces dollar dominance. Every jurisdiction that adopts GENIUS Act-compatible stablecoins is structurally tied to U.S. financial infrastructure.
This is the infrastructure that matters. Not trade agreements that expire. Not tariff arrangements that change with administrations. This is permanent. This is technical. This is already happening.
The Bottom Line
The U.S. built the framework to ensure the next generation of global finance runs on dollars. The mechanism is straightforward: every stablecoin issued = Treasury demand. At scale, stablecoin issuers will hold more Treasuries than most countries. The fiscal benefit ($1-4 trillion in Treasury purchases) is real and significant. The geopolitical benefit (permanent monetary sovereignty extension) is more important and irreversible. The question was never 'if' but 'how fast.' And the answer is: faster than expected, with less drama than anticipated. The real move happened while everyone was distracted by the crypto debate. Dollar 2.0 is being built in plain sight.
—
Disclaimer
The analysis presented here represents independent strategic research exploring stablecoin infrastructure, GENIUS Act mechanics, Treasury demand mechanisms, and dollar architecture evolution. Scenarios and technical assessments discussed are analytical projections based on regulatory documentation, stablecoin market data, and bilateral framework analysis—not predictions or recommendations. This work does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. All scenarios represent analytical assessments of observable trends and structural constraints. Readers should verify all claims independently and consult appropriate financial, legal, and tax professionals before making investment or strategic decisions based on these concepts.
SelectGlobal, LLC provides integrated economic development consulting services including market research, site selection, government relations, and operational setup for companies expanding in North America and globally. This analysis reflects the firm's assessment of macro trends relevant to clients navigating industrial realignment but does not constitute specific advice for any individual company or situation. The information and opinions contained in this document have been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, or correctness. All strategic frameworks, analytical judgments, and editorial decisions reflect independent assessment by SelectGlobal.
Ready for Day 7?
